Bug 1663367
Summary: | [RHV-RHGS] Deleting 1TB image file, leads to errors in RHV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> | |
Component: | sharding | Assignee: | Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj> | |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | SATHEESARAN <sasundar> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | rhgs-3.4 | CC: | bkunal, rcyriac, rhs-bugs, sabose, sankarshan, sasundar, storage-qa-internal | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1663368 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-01-21 10:59:09 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1663368 |
Description
SATHEESARAN
2019-01-04 05:16:46 UTC
Requesting volume-profile for the run where the host went unresponsive. (In reply to Krutika Dhananjay from comment #1) > Requesting volume-profile for the run where the host went unresponsive. Hi Krutika, We did the series of tests and here are the observations. RHV RHGS Result 4.0.7 3.0 ( 3.8.4-18.6.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes problems 4.0.7 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes problems 4.2.8 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) No issues seen while deleting the images We too tried to have RHGS 3.0 with RHV 4.2.8 and due to dependency problems, unable to add RHV 4.0 nodes to RHV Manager 4.2.8 The tests are carried out for preallocated disk images and also with creating a 1TB thin provisioned disk and filling it with data up to 990GB. So results looks like RHV 4.0 with RHGS combinations is having a problem. @Sahina, what do you think ? (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #2) > (In reply to Krutika Dhananjay from comment #1) > > Requesting volume-profile for the run where the host went unresponsive. > > Hi Krutika, > > We did the series of tests and here are the observations. > > RHV RHGS Result > 4.0.7 3.0 ( 3.8.4-18.6.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes > problems > 4.0.7 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes > problems > 4.2.8 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) No issues seen while deleting > the images > > We too tried to have RHGS 3.0 with RHV 4.2.8 and due to dependency problems, > unable to add RHV 4.0 nodes to RHV Manager 4.2.8 > The tests are carried out for preallocated disk images and also with > creating a 1TB thin provisioned disk and filling it with > data up to 990GB. > > So results looks like RHV 4.0 with RHGS combinations is having a problem. > > > @Sahina, what do you think ? Is the issue with the images created using older version of RHV + RHGS? Can these images be deleted successfully on update to latest versions of RHV & RHGS? (In reply to Sahina Bose from comment #3) > (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #2) > > (In reply to Krutika Dhananjay from comment #1) > > > Requesting volume-profile for the run where the host went unresponsive. > > > > Hi Krutika, > > > > We did the series of tests and here are the observations. > > > > RHV RHGS Result > > 4.0.7 3.0 ( 3.8.4-18.6.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes > > problems > > 4.0.7 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) Deleting the image causes > > problems > > 4.2.8 3.4.3 ( 3.12.2-35.el7rhgs ) No issues seen while deleting > > the images > > > > We too tried to have RHGS 3.0 with RHV 4.2.8 and due to dependency problems, > > unable to add RHV 4.0 nodes to RHV Manager 4.2.8 > > The tests are carried out for preallocated disk images and also with > > creating a 1TB thin provisioned disk and filling it with > > data up to 990GB. > > > > So results looks like RHV 4.0 with RHGS combinations is having a problem. > > > > > > @Sahina, what do you think ? > > Is the issue with the images created using older version of RHV + RHGS? > Can these images be deleted successfully on update to latest versions of RHV > & RHGS? The issue was seen with RHV 4.0 & upgrading to new gluster version. But the RHV version wasn't upgraded to RHV 4.2.8. Will complete that part of the testing, and let you know the results This issue is seen with RHGS 3.0 & RHV 4.0.7. When updating to the latest RHGS 3.4.2 ( glusterfs-3.12.2-32.el7rhgs ) and RHV 4.2.7, this issue is not seen any more. I have discussed the same with Sahina, and I'm closing this bug as the issue is not seen with latest gluster builds |