Bug 166421
Summary: | Installed language info not used after install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Jos Vos <jos> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-08-22 17:21:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jos Vos
2005-08-20 20:54:18 UTC
This is intentional. If you set %_install_langs, then there is no reasonable way to add support for a new language after installation. Can you explain? At this moment you can not add support for a new language either, as the installed files for the existing packages won't change (and this will never change, I guess). Now it's inconsistent: at install only the chosen subset is installed, after that all languages are installed. In my proposal at least all packages are installed the same way: during and after installation. And "adding a supported language" afterwards would mean changing SUPPORTED in /etc/sysconfig/i18n and %_install_langs in /etc/rpm/macros.lang. This will not have effect on the installed packages, but that's the same as it is now. We don't set %_install_langs in the install anymore either. Take a look in anaconda/language.py and you'll see all the references to %_install_langs are commented out. If we were still setting %_install_langs, then yes, this would make all kinds of sense to do. Hmmm... yes, I missed that, sorry for the confusion. So, having language-specific files in an rpm is more-or-less useless, as only complete rpm's are skipped via the language tags in comps.xml, right? |