Bug 1665528

Summary: UI: Showing RHV credentials full path on Ansible Credentials page.
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Satyajit Bulage <sbulage>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Satyajit Bulage <sbulage>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.9.7CC: bmidwood, dmetzger, hkataria, lavenel, mpovolny, mzazrivec, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 5.9.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: ansible_embed
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-18 10:04:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot showing actual result none

Description Satyajit Bulage 2019-01-11 16:24:24 UTC
Created attachment 1520089 [details]
Screenshot showing actual result

Description of problem: Credentials type showing full path for RHV credentials


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.9.7.2.20190109154935_c0d03d6


How reproducible:100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Enable Embedded Ansible Role
2. Add RHV credentials 
3.

Actual results: Credentials type showing "ManageIQ/Providers/Embedded Ansible/Automation Manager/Rhv Credential"


Expected results: It should be "Credential(RHV)" unlike other credentials.


Additional info:

Comment 2 Milan Zázrivec 2019-01-14 10:11:10 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1568687 ***

Comment 5 Milan Zázrivec 2019-01-14 10:25:48 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1568687 ***

Comment 8 Milan Zázrivec 2019-01-18 10:04:28 UTC
Thanks for the appliance, but I don't need it.

For the third time, I'm going to close this bug as a duplicate of bug #1568687
since that's what it is. My hope is that it will stay that way. Or perhaps
I'll get an explanation for why I'm wrong ant this is not a duplicate.

Thanks.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1568687 ***