Bug 1666736
Summary: | Please update the version of HDF5 library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Alexander Korsunsky <a.korsunsky> |
Component: | hdf5 | Assignee: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel7 | CC: | anto.trande, bugzilla, c.david86, dakingun, igor.raits, orion |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-01-16 15:29:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alexander Korsunsky
2019-01-16 13:48:09 UTC
All clients must be recompiled for each new version of HDF5. We do not introduce such breakage into EPEL. And certainly not the major change that is 1.10. So what is the consequence of this? Does this mean effectively that EPEL will forever stay on the same HDF5 version, and never receive newer fixes and features? Yes. *** Bug 1670379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |