Bug 1670031
Summary: | performance regression seen with smallfile workload tests | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Amar Tumballi <atumball> |
Component: | core | Assignee: | bugs <bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | mainline | CC: | amukherj, atumball, bugs, guillaume.pavese, jahernan, nbalacha, pkarampu, rgowdapp, srangana |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Performance |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-6.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-03-25 16:33:11 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Amar Tumballi
2019-01-28 13:12:32 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22107 (features/sdfs: disable by default) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22107 (features/sdfs: disable by default) merged (#3) on master by Atin Mukherjee It might be worth to open a different bugzilla to track the perf regression for sdfs only considering this bug is used as a tracker. REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22120 (inode: Reduce work load of inode_table->lock section) posted (#6) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22156 (inode: granular locking) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22183 (inode: create inode outside locked region) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22184 (inode: make critical section smaller) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22185 (inode: dentry_destroy outside of dentry_unset) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22186 (inode: don't take lock on whole table during ref/unref) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22188 (inode: do only required checks inside critical section.) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22183 (inode: create inode outside locked region) merged (#4) on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22184 (inode: make critical section smaller) merged (#10) on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22242 (inode: reduce inode-path execution time) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/22243 (inode: handle list management outside of ref/unref code) posted (#1) for review on master by Amar Tumballi Has git bisect been used to narrow down the patches that have caused the regression? The inode code has not changed in a long time so this is unlikely to be the cause of the slowdown. > Has git bisect been used to narrow down the patches that have caused the regression? The inode code has not changed in a long time so this is unlikely to be the cause of the slowdown.
Ack, inode code is surely not the reason. The code/features identified as reasons for some of the regressions were:
* no-root-squash PID for mkdir-layout set code in DHT (for mkdir)
* gfid2path xattr setting (for rename)
* ctime setting (for rmdir and few other entry ops, which seemed minor).
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-6.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-6.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2019-March/000120.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/ REVISION POSTED: https://review.gluster.org/22242 (inode: reduce inode-path execution time) posted (#3) for review on master by Amar Tumballi |