Bug 1671499

Summary: fatal: unable to make sense of XML-RPC response from server. XML-RPC response too large.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Brian J. Murrell <brian>
Component: libreportAssignee: abrt <abrt-devel-list>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 29CC: abrt-devel-list, jakub, jmilan, mhabrnal, michal.toman, mkutlak, mmarusak
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 961520 Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-01 08:38:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Brian J. Murrell 2019-01-31 17:54:53 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #961520 +++

Description of problem:

I encountered a crash with anaconda and automatic partitioning, i reported it.
The reporting process ended with the bug 961515 being reported and its attachments upload, or at least it seems so.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F19b TC3 (19.24-1)

How reproducible:
once

Steps to Reproduce:
1. get a crash (bug 961515)
2. report it
  
Actual results:
unknown, got this error. the bug-report was generated.

Expected results:
no error.

Additional info:

Processing failed:
fatal: unable to make sense of XML-RPC response from server. XML-RPC response too large. Our limit... (off screen)
exited with #1.

[snip]

This is still a problem on Fedora 29 trying to report a crash with gnome-shell:

--- Running analyze_BodhiUpdates ---
Looking for similar problems in bugzilla
fatal: Unable to make sense of XML-RPC response from server.  XML-RPC response too large.  Our limit is 4194304 characters.  We got 28196188 characters.  Use XMLRPC_TRACE_XML to see for yourself

Comment 1 Martin Kutlak 2019-02-01 08:38:39 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1660227 ***