Bug 1671844
| Summary: | [RFE] Remove GCE Provider | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Loic Avenel <lavenel> |
| Component: | API | Assignee: | drew uhlmann <duhlmann> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Mike Shriver <mshriver> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | agrare, bmidwood, dmetzger, hkataria, jfrey, lavenel, mpovolny, mshriver, obarenbo, simaishi, smallamp, yrudman |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | FutureFeature, RFE |
| Target Release: | 5.11.0 | Flags: | mfeifer:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.11.0.13 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-12-12 13:35:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | Feature | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Loic Avenel
2019-02-01 20:42:58 UTC
Renamed the title as it is misleading. Provider has already been disabled, but the API needs to prevent adding it. The API issue should probably be a separate BZ because it's likely a systemic issue, not a GCE specific issue. That is, I bet you can add *any* disabled provider at the moment. Tested in CFME 5.11.0.14 The GCE provider add via REST now returns 400 response containing "Api::BadRequestError: Could not create the new provider - Validation failed: emstype ManageIQ::Providers::Google::CloudManager is not supported for create" Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199 |