Bug 1672903

Summary: Review Request: erlang-hex_core - Reference implementation of Hex specifications.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Timothée Floure <timothee.floure>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: lemenkov, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lemenkov: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: erlang-hex_core-0.4.0-1.fc30 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-15 13:52:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Timothée Floure 2019-02-06 07:46:30 UTC
Spec URL: https://git.sr.ht/~fnux/rpm-playground/blob/6649a7cd4569829c70747d73f9355ba1fc37e301/erlang-hex_core/erlang-hex_core.spec
SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3963/32573963/erlang-hex_core-0.4.0-1.fc30.src.rpm
Description: Reference implementation of Hex specifications.
Fedora Account System Username: fnux

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2019-02-06 13:10:11 UTC
I'll review it

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2019-02-06 13:14:33 UTC
REVIEW:

[+] rpmlint is silent (or produces only messages which can be safely ignored:

Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../SRPMS/erlang-hex_core-0.4.0-1.fc29.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/erlang-hex_core-0.4.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm 
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: 

[+] The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
[+] The package meets the Packaging Guidelines (incl. yet officially promoted Erlang Packaging Guidelines).
[+] The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (Apache 2.0).
[+] The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc and marked as %license.
[+] The spec file is written in American English.
[+] The spec file for the package is legible.
[+] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL.

Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: sha256sum hex_core-0.4.0.tar*
8ace8c6cfa10df4cb8be876f42f7446890e124203c094cc7b4e7616fb8de5d7f  hex_core-0.4.0.tar
8ace8c6cfa10df4cb8be876f42f7446890e124203c094cc7b4e7616fb8de5d7f  hex_core-0.4.0.tar.1
Auriga ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES: 

[+] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms (tested on my machine).
[+] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
[0] No need to handle locales.
[0] The package does not contain any shared library files.
[+] Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries.
[+] The package isn't designed to be relocatable.
[+] The package owns all directories that it creates.
[+] The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
[+] Permissions on files are set properly.
[+] The package consistently uses macros.
[+] The package contains code, or permissible content.
[0] No large documentation files.
[+] Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
[0] No static libraries.
[0] No -devel sub-package.
[+] The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
[0] Not a GUI application.
[+] The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[+] All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


APPROVED.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-02-06 14:45:49 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/erlang-hex_core