Bug 1673978
Summary: | ReaR unable to create the Rescue ISO when having a lot of multipath devices | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Pavel Cahyna <pcahyna> | |
Component: | rear | Assignee: | Pavel Cahyna <pcahyna> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Jež <djez> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | urgent | |||
Version: | 8.0 | CC: | djez, fkrska, jwboyer, ovasik, pcahyna, qe-baseos-apps, rmetrich, toneata | |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch, Regression, Reproducer, ZStream | |
Target Release: | 8.0 | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | rear-2.4-8.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | 1672938 | |||
: | 1691303 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-05 21:04:10 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1672938, 1681544 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1691303, 1701002 |
Comment 1
Pavel Cahyna
2019-02-12 14:35:09 UTC
We could try with real SCSI, for example tons of iSCSI luns. That has been my idea as well, but I need to work on other stuff now.... Not promising anything, but will try to setup something. That would be great. My idea was to setup one machine with lots of scsi_debug LUNs (with enough RAM, using the workaround or using RHEL 7 to not suffer from the bug), exporting them via iSCSI target, and let another machine connect to it using a iSCSI initiator. I cannot reproduce the old good slowness with iscsi, but still we can see a difference. Server setup: ------------ # yum -y install targetcli # cat iscsi.sh #!/bin/bash ( for vol in $(seq 1 100); do echo "backstores/fileio create file_or_dev=/root/iscsi/vol${vol}.img size=1M name=vol${vol}" done for tgt in $(seq 1 4); do echo "iscsi/ create iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:tgt${tgt}" echo "iscsi/iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:tgt${tgt}/tpg1/acls create iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:client" for vol in $(seq 1 100); do echo "iscsi/iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:tgt${tgt}/tpg1/luns create /backstores/fileio/vol${vol}" done done ) | targetcli # chmod +x iscsi.sh; ./iscsi.sh --> creates 100 luns and 4 targets # systemctl start target Client setup: ------------ # yum -y install iscsi-initiator-utils device-mapper-multipath # echo "InitiatorName=iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:client" > /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi # iscsiadm -m discovery -t st -p <server_ipaddr> # for i in $(seq 1 4); do iscsiadm -m node -T iqn.2019-02.com.bz1673978:tgt$i -p <server_ipaddr> -l; done WITHOUT THE FIX: # time rear mkrescue real 4m14.741s user 1m56.594s sys 1m57.890s WITH THE FIX: # time rear mkrescue real 1m38.588s user 0m50.723s sys 0m31.869s I suspect you are not actually using multipath. How many /dev/dm-* devices do you have? Use multipath -l to verify. In my test case, I am enabling multipath with mpathconf --enable --with_multipathd y I don't think that installing device-mapper-multipath was enough. However, the question regarding iscsi was mainly about the memory consumption of such a large number of iSCSI devices at the initiator - whether you are also seeing this memory consumption on the order of GBs like we do with the scsi_debug driver. Multipath is activated on my system (I used a VM already with multipath disks). And I don't see any memory impact. > creates 100 luns and 4 targets The number of paths per LUN is equal to the number of targets, right? i.e. 4 paths per LUN. I suspect that 100 luns is not enough to see the problem, the old code IIUC has a quadratic complexity in the number of devices. So my test which uses 1200 devices in total (400 LUNs x 3 paths per LUN) should be 9x slower than your case, if it uses 400 devices. > And I don't see any memory impact. Is that on RHEL8? Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:3413 |