Bug 167399
| Summary: | "evince" renders certain fonts incorrectly | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joachim Frieben <jfrieben> | ||||||
| Component: | evince | Assignee: | Kristian Høgsberg <krh> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | 4 | CC: | starback | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-09-22 20:52:38 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Joachim Frieben
2005-09-02 11:31:40 UTC
Created attachment 118388 [details]
Sample PDF file rendered by "evince"
Created attachment 118389 [details]
Sample PDF file rendered by "xpdf"
After converting the PDF file to PS by means od "pdftops", the resulting PS file is rendered correctly by "evince". The problem seems to be Red Hat specific as no other tested distribution exhibits the reported anomaly. Issue resolved for a current rawhide test system. Well, I have to correct myself, or this is partially broken again. At least for the current tree, the Times font is rendered correctly but the characters are not bold ones. As mentioned above, displaying the PDF file by some other flavour of Linux distro using "evince", no similar regression is observed. After installing Truetype support for teTeX 3.0, the newly create PDF file displays correctly. The previous PDF file was created by pdfTeX-1.10b (FC3 flavour of teTeX 2.0.2), the current one by pdfeTeX-1.21a. The font list is longer for the current version than the previous one. Possibly, a bug in the earlier pdfTeX release was hence the culprit. Sounds like this was fixed, so I'm closing the bug. If the problem persists, please reopen, but do attach the pdf file in question, thanks. |