Bug 1675894
| Summary: | roca-detect: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f30 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||
| Component: | roca-detect | Assignee: | Stuart D Gathman <stuart> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Version: | 31 | CC: | stuart | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | roca-detect-1.2.12-12.fc31 roca-detect-1.2.12-12.fc32 roca-detect-1.2.12-12.fc30 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2020-05-20 03:15:00 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1674516 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2019-02-11 21:49:21 UTC
Created attachment 1532679 [details]
build.log
file build.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1532680 [details]
root.log
file root.log too big, will only attach last 1024 bytes
Created attachment 1532681 [details]
state.log
Dear Maintainer, your package has not been built successfully in f30. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package can be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The issue here is that python3-pgpdump (and python2) is orphaned, and roca-detect depends on it. I could adopt pgpdump - but I'm still trying to figure out this modular stuff to keep openas2 going. Roca-detect scans for a particular type of weak RSA key, and most updated key generation software avoids this weakness. But being able to scan is good because there are old keys and proprietary routers and stuff. Maybe I could bundle pgpdump? roca-detect-1.2.12-6.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ac03b691cb I bundled pgpdump3. I probably did it all wrong. I can adopt the python3-pgpdump package, but I've got a lot on my plate and went for a quick and dirty. If someone else adopts python3-pgpdump, then it will conflict with roca-detect - which is a clue that I did it wrong. The change is only in rawhide and f30-testing, so it can be undone. roca-detect-1.2.12-6.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ac03b691cb I think a better solution is to make a sub-package for pgpdump. That way, if someone adopts pgpdump, a higher version or release will override the one from here. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'. FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1 FEDORA-2020-48959a1981 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-48959a1981 FEDORA-2020-48959a1981 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-48959a1981` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-48959a1981 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-1b7be0b475 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1b7be0b475` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1b7be0b475 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-1b7be0b475 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-a18aa304c1 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-48959a1981 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |