Bug 167592

Summary: [ttfonts-pa] output for u0A07 + u0A70 is wrong
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Lawrence Lim <llim>
Component: ttfonts-indicAssignee: Darshan Santani <dsantani>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: aalam, eng-i18n-bugs, tools-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-20 16:03:16 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 126002    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Image showing the expected behaviour none

Description Lawrence Lim 2005-09-06 01:16:40 UTC 
Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. copy and paste part (c) into gedit
http://bob.brisbane.redhat.com/~llch/bugs/151630/151630-test-case.txt
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Wrong output

Expected results:
Correct output

Additional info:
Scrrenshot of current wrong output, part (a)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=112164

Screenshot of correct output, part (c)
http://bob.brisbane.redhat.com/~llch/bugs/151630/151630-test-case-gold.png
Comment 2 Darshan Santani 2006-07-21 13:32:58 UTC 
Fixed in RAWHIDE [fonts-punjabi-2.0-1]
Comment 3 Darshan Santani 2006-07-21 13:34:00 UTC 
Created attachment 132807 [details]
Image showing the expected behaviour
Comment 4 Darshan Santani 2006-07-31 14:00:02 UTC 
FIXED in RAWHIDE
[fonts-indic-2.0-2]
Comment 5 A S Alam 2006-08-31 09:21:23 UTC 
confirmed that it is fixed in Rawhide:
tested with following version:
fonts-punjabi-2.0.1-1