Bug 1676360

Summary: Force user to grow metadata, if user manually extends datalv of a thinpool and the current metadata size will not be enough to address the new size pool
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: nikhil kshirsagar <nkshirsa>
Component: lvm2Assignee: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac>
lvm2 sub component: Thin Provisioning QA Contact: cluster-qe <cluster-qe>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE Docs Contact:
Severity: medium    
Priority: urgent CC: agk, cmarthal, heinzm, jbrassow, mcsontos, msnitzer, pasik, prajnoha, rhandlin, thornber, zkabelac
Version: 8.0   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: lvm2-2.03.05-1.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-01 07:32:41 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1680951    
Bug Blocks:    

Description nikhil kshirsagar 2019-02-12 04:03:03 UTC
Description of problem:

This bz created out of similar RHEL7 bz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676359

As discussed on https://docs.google.com/document/d/15J2tSBc3scl_Gtl4dbhFUe6ApPo90yrlAJZ6e59i4z0 point 2, we must force (or at least strongly warn) users to grow metadata manually too, if they manually grow the thinpool data using lvextend. This will prevent metadata full issues in the future.

Additional info:

Many gluster customers have small pools created by default scripts during setup, and have autoextend turned off by design, because gluster wants to be in control of the storage allocation, and doesn't allow autoextension because that would circumvent their storage manager. This results in customers manually increasing data subsequently, but many times forgetting to increase metadata too. Eventually metadata reaches 100% and thinpool corruptions ensue.

Comment 8 RHEL Program Management 2021-02-01 07:32:41 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 9 Zdenek Kabelac 2021-02-01 15:17:17 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1610260 ***