|Summary:||Corrupted BDFs generated when using fstobdf on a X.org xfs|
|Product:||Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4||Reporter:||Bastien Nocera <bnocera>|
|Component:||xorg-x11||Assignee:||Mike A. Harris <mharris>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||RHBA-2006-0072||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2006-03-07 18:16:38 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Bastien Nocera 2005-09-07 11:11:30 UTC
The original Xfree86 bug was fixed: http://bugzilla.xfree.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 But the problem still occurs with X.org's fstobdf. Filed with X.org as 4381.
Comment 1 Mike A. Harris 2005-09-12 16:00:15 UTC
Thanks Bastien. I've reviewed the upstream bug report you posted, the source code, and the patch attached to the upstream bug report. The patch seems low-risk, and is used in later XFree86 releases. I think it is reasonable to include this patch in Fedora development and get it tested, then assuming no regressions or other problems occur, when development begins on RHEL4U3 we can consider including this in the update also. Thanks again.
Comment 5 Mike A. Harris 2005-11-29 08:26:30 UTC
Fixed in xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.13.21 Setting status to "MODIFIED". Please test and report back success or failure.
Comment 6 Mike A. Harris 2005-11-29 10:52:36 UTC
xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.13.21 is now available for download and testing via ftp at the following URL: ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris/testing/4E Please test this release as soon as possible, and provide feedback on the results of testing in a status update. If the problem is not resolved after installing all of the rpm packages, and rebooting the system, please set the bug back to "ASSIGNED" state.
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-03-07 18:16:38 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0072.html