Bug 167957
Summary: | gnome-themes-2.12.0-1 complain about theme index | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal> |
Component: | redhat-artwork | Assignee: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | billcrawford1970 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-10-12 14:41:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2005-09-09 21:11:26 UTC
With a freshly installed gnome-themes-2.12.0-2 and redhat-artwork-0.128-2, which owns '/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve-inverse', I see exactly the same complaint as above. So in what sense this is "CLOSED RAWHIDE"? In the sense that I fixed the problem in redhat-artwork, but overlooked that the same issue occurs in the gnome-icon-theme %post. Should be fixed tomorrow. > Should be fixed tomorrow.
Hm, I just installed new gnome-themes-2.12.1-1 with 2005-10-05 build date
and I see the same complaints as originally reported. Actually no; looking
closer there is also something new, i.e. '... /icons/locolor', in that:
No theme index file in '/usr/share/icons/Bluecurve-inverse'.
If you really want to create an icon cache here, use --ignore-theme-index.
No theme index file in '/usr/share/icons/locolor'.
If you really want to create an icon cache here, use --ignore-theme-index.
If that should be truly ignored then maybe
... >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
in %post is good enough?
Moreover "file /usr/share/icons/locolor is not owned by any package".
A leftover from some package (redhat-artwork?) which did install that in the
past but did not bother to admit an ownership? Everying in this directory
is "not owned by any package".
*** Bug 168011 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |