Bug 168216

Summary: LTC18126-[RHEL4] FSRACER test terminating abnormally
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Issue Tracker <tao>
Component: kernelAssignee: Larry Woodman <lwoodman>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: jbaron, tao
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL4-U3 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-17 18:43:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 170416    
Attachments:
Description Flags
FSRACER testcase from IBM.
none
Patch for fs/namei.c none

Description Issue Tracker 2005-09-13 16:02:11 UTC
Escalated to Bugzilla from IssueTracker

Comment 21 Larry Woodman 2005-09-20 17:00:10 UTC
The problem here is that there is some sort of leand in the slabcache. 
Specifically iy appears that the names_cache it consuming all of lowmem which
results in an OOM kill.  Please get me an entire /proc/slabinfo output when the
OOM kill occurs.  Please attach that output as well as the show_mem() output
that appears on the console when the OOM kill occurs. 

BTW, is this a regression from RHEL4-U1 or did the same problem happen when you
ran this application/test on that kernel?

Larry Woodman


Comment 22 Larry Woodman 2005-09-20 17:26:55 UTC
Let me re-write me last comment im "english" !!!

The problem here is that there is some sort of leak in the slabcache.
Specifically it appears that the names_cache is consuming all of lowmem which
results in an OOM kill.  Please get me an entire /proc/slabinfo output when the
OOM kill occurs.  Please attach that output as well as the show_mem() output
that appears on the console when the OOM kill occurs. 

BTW, is this problem a regression from RHEL4-U1 or did the same problem happen
when you ran this application/test on that kernel?

Larry Woodman

Comment 25 Larry Woodman 2005-10-11 20:37:25 UTC
Can we get a repeoducer from IBM here???

Larry Woodman


Comment 26 Mike Gahagan 2005-10-11 20:56:09 UTC
Created attachment 119820 [details]
FSRACER testcase from IBM.

Comment 28 Mike Gahagan 2005-10-25 14:40:41 UTC
Created attachment 120367 [details]
Patch for fs/namei.c 

This patch is more complete and based on the patch which Rick had submitted to
mainline and has been accepted.