Bug 1684837
| Summary: | libprelude-5.0.0-1.fc29 provides libprelude.so.28, but suricata-4.0.6-1.fc29 requires libprelude.so.23 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matt Fagnani <matt.fagnani> |
| Component: | libprelude | Assignee: | Thomas Andrejak <thomas.andrejak> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 29 | CC: | jtfas90, mail, sgrubb, thomas.andrejak, tscherf, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-07-14 12:58:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Matt Fagnani
2019-03-02 23:32:02 UTC
I am not sure introducing a soname bump so late in a release cycle (fedora 29) is a good idea. It looks like the reason the version was bumped was to fix the FTBFS for f30[0][1]. If that's the case I would recommend just pushing/building libprelude 5.0.0 for f30/rawhide and leaving f29 at the libprelude 4.x release. [0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1217708 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629893 thoughts? As a side note, I commented on the libprelude 5.0.0 build with a negative karma so the build doesn't get automatically pushed and break the fedora 29 suricata release. JT Might Thomas and prelude's other maintainers intend to update to prelude-*-5.0.0 in F29? Do prelude-*-5.0.0 require libprelude-5.0.0? Are there other fixes in the 5.0.0 branch? Are there incompatible API/ABI changes in libprelude-5.0.0 that might affect the building of suricata? Jason, if you or Steve see problems when building suricata with libprelude-5.0.0 for F30/rawhide, then rebuilding suricata for F29 might not be needed. Thanks. Hello I intend to update the whole prelude packages to 5.0 in f29 if it's possible. The API/ABI changed but with retrocompatiblity. Unfortunately, upstream bump the soname ... If it's too difficult to rebuild suricata, I will cancel prelude bump version in F29. Regards Normally big changes like that are done in rawhide instead of a shipped distro. There is time to get this into F30 since its still in development mode. Also, there is some policy that soname bumps should be announced on fedora-devel. How much runtime has this version of libprelude spent in rawhide? Hello Too few runtime in rawhide. OK, so no prelude 5.0 in f29. No problem. Regards |