Bug 1685029
| Summary: | `llvm-config --bindir' points to /usr/lib64/llvm/clang | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Martin Stransky <stransky> |
| Component: | llvm | Assignee: | serge_sans_paille <sguelton> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 30 | CC: | dmalcolm, jakub, jistone, scottt.tw, sguelton, siddharth.kde, tstellar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc30 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-03-29 19:11:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Martin Stransky
2019-03-04 08:29:09 UTC
Failed FF build task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33121406 According to the documentation, [...] --bindir Directory containing LLVM executables. And llvm-related binaries are indeed installed in that location. I'll probably make sure clang also install symlinks to that location so that everything is consistent. (In reply to serge_sans_paille from comment #2) > According to the documentation, > > [...] > --bindir Directory containing LLVM executables. > > And llvm-related binaries are indeed installed in that location. > > I'll probably make sure clang also install symlinks to that location so that > everything is consistent. Before 8.0.0 update the --bindir pointed to /usr/bin. It's returns /usr/lib64/llvm/ now where the clang is missing. Does that mean the configure script is broken and the llvm-config --bindir should not be used for clang location? Thanks. I've discussed with @tstellar and we'll keep the previous behavior. Everything should be back to normal in rawhide by llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc31 and clang-8.0.0-0.5.rc3.fc31. Can you confirm its okay for you? if so I'll apply the same patches to f30. (In reply to serge_sans_paille from comment #4) > I've discussed with @tstellar and we'll keep the previous behavior. > Everything should be back to normal in rawhide by llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc31 > and clang-8.0.0-0.5.rc3.fc31. Can you confirm its okay for you? if so I'll > apply the same patches to f30. Seems to be functional in rawhide, please backport to F30. Thanks! clang-8.0.0-0.5.rc3.fc30 llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ba6de71571 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ba6de71571 should fix the issue for f30 clang-8.0.0-0.5.rc3.fc30, llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ba6de71571 clang-8.0.0-0.5.rc3.fc30, llvm-8.0.0-0.4.rc3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |