|Summary:||Many ConfigMaps and Pods slow down cluster, until it becomes unavailable (since 1.12)|
|Product:||OpenShift Container Platform||Reporter:||Tomáš Nožička <tnozicka>|
|Component:||Master||Assignee:||Michal Fojtik <mfojtik>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Simon <skordas>|
|Version:||4.1.0||CC:||aos-bugs, jokerman, mifiedle, mmccomas, rkrawitz, sjenning, xxia, yinzhou|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||If docs needed, set a value|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2019-06-04 10:45:20 UTC||Type:||Bug|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Tomáš Nožička 2019-03-07 15:11:56 UTC
Comment 3 Michal Fojtik 2019-03-08 10:33:20 UTC
Bumping apiserver max streams here: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/332
Comment 4 Michal Fojtik 2019-03-08 14:44:57 UTC
Not sure what QE can test here, but both PR's were merged so the mentioned kube issue should be mitigated for 4.0. Moving to QE so they can set to VERIFIED.
Comment 7 zhou ying 2019-03-14 09:27:39 UTC
@Tomáš Nožička, @Michal Fojtik , Could you please give me some advise for how to verify this issue ? thanks in advance.
Comment 8 Tomáš Nožička 2019-03-14 11:03:53 UTC
try something like this https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/74412#issuecomment-471456235 or as described here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/74412#issue-413387234 """ For example, consider a scenario in which I schedule 400 jobs, each with its own ConfigMap, which print "Hello World" on a single-node cluster would. On v1.11, it takes about 10 minutes for the cluster to process all jobs. New jobs can be scheduled. On v1.12 and v1.13, it takes about 60 minutes for the cluster to process all jobs. After this, no new jobs can be scheduled. What you expected to happen: I did not expect this scenario to cause my nodes to become unavailable in Kubernetes 1.12 and 1.13, and would have expected the behavior which I observe in 1.11. """ Ideally make sure it breaks the cluster without this fix and then try the same with the fix.
Comment 9 zhou ying 2019-03-15 03:01:40 UTC
Hi Mike: Could you please help verify this issue ? Thanks in advance.
Comment 11 Simon 2019-03-19 17:58:55 UTC
Retest: BUILD: 4.0.0-0.nightly-2019-03-19-004004 https://openshift-release.svc.ci.openshift.org/releasestream/4.0.0-0.nightly/release/4.0.0-0.nightly-2019-03-19-004004 oc version --short Client Version: v4.0.6 Server Version: v1.12.4+befe71b One worker node: oc get machineset -n openshift-machine-api NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AVAILABLE AGE skordas19-d7s2t-worker-us-east-2a 1 1 1 1 86m Script: https://github.com/openshift/svt/pull/567 Test run: Run #1: 300 jobs: 383s (6m 23s) 1.277s/job Run #2: 300 jobs: 397s (6m 37s) 1.33s/job Run #3: 300 jobs: 379s (6m 19s) 1.263s/job Run #4: 600 jobs: 771s (12m 51s) 1.285s/job Run #5: 600 jobs: 796s (13m 16s) 1.326s/job
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2019-06-04 10:45:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758