Bug 1688364

Summary:	API - Document in apidoc /katello/api/v2/errata?available_for=.. option
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Component:	Errata Management	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Akhil Jha <akjha>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	6.4.2	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Milestone:	Unspecified
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-07-09 17:02:24 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pavel Moravec 2019-03-13 15:42:01 UTC

Description of problem:
Errata search allows quite generic/rich search like:

/katello/api/v2/errata?available_for=content_view_filter&filterId=123

(supported values seem to be content_view_filter, activation_key, host, content_view, and also sync_plan(?)) but our apidoc does not mention it at all.

Please add to to https://theforeman.org/plugins/katello/3.10/api/apidoc/v2/errata/index.html (or higher katello version, of course)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
katello up to 0.11


How reproducible:
100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to WebUI of Satellite
2. check https://satellite.example.com/apidoc/v2/errata/index.html


Actual results:
2. doesnt show available_for option


Expected results:
2. to show that option, incl. suboptions (filterId for CV filters, contentViewId for CVs,..)


Additional info:

Comment 3 Brad Buckingham 2019-03-25 19:37:55 UTC

related bug 1688369

Comment 4 Mike McCune 2021-06-08 21:14:36 UTC

Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.

Comment 5 Mike McCune 2021-07-09 17:02:24 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you.