Summary: | OCP4 Upgrade test failed on ci-builids | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Hongkai Liu <hongkliu> |
Component: | Cluster Version Operator | Assignee: | Abhinav Dahiya <adahiya> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hongkai Liu <hongkliu> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.1.0 | CC: | adahiya, aos-bugs, hongkliu, jmencak, jokerman, mmccomas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.1.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-06-04 10:45:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: |
Description
Hongkai Liu
2019-03-13 18:09:16 UTC
This is all just coming together right now, please check again in one weeks time. Please close if it's resolved then. Will check in a week. I also heard from my team they have got several success updates. Upgrade from 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-102101 to 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 succeeded. The only thing is that the number showing the progress of `% complete` is not incremental. Is that expected? # oc adm upgrade --to-image=registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 Updating to release image registry.svc.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 ... # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True True 11m Working towards 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710: 24% complete root@ip-172-31-31-218: ~ # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True True 14m Working towards 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710: 33% complete # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True True 16m Working towards 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710: 37% complete # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True True 18m Working towards 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710: 2% complete # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True True 18m Working towards 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710: 16% complete ... # oc get clusterversion version NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS version 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 True False 18m Cluster version is 4.0.0-0.ci-2019-03-19-122710 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688454#c5 is not related to this bug. > The upgrade is done on ci-builds. > After upgrading, console is not accessible and oc-cli is very very slow. > I am wondering what to do in such situation? Is there rolling-back if upgrade failed. rollbacks are not supported or performed automatically. And based on these logs: > # time oc status > Error from server (ServiceUnavailable): the server is currently unable to handle the request (get routes.route.openshift.io) > Error from server (ServiceUnavailable): the server is currently unable to handle the request (get buildconfigs.build.openshift.io) > Error from server (ServiceUnavailable): the server is currently unable to handle the request (get builds.build.openshift.io) > Error from server (ServiceUnavailable): the server is currently unable to handle the request (get imagestreams.image.openshift.io) > Error from server (ServiceUnavailable): the server is currently unable to handle the request (get deploymentconfigs.apps.openshift.io) There was a failure to upgrade openshift-apiserver. Can you provide information if upgrade is still failing... if it is please provide `oc get co -oyaml` `oc get clusterversion -oyaml` so that we can track which operator is failing. Thanks, Abhinav, already redid the test in Comment 5. upgrade was good there ... except the process percentage is not incremental. Let me know if you think I should run the update again. (In reply to Hongkai Liu from comment #8) > Thanks, Abhinav, > > already redid the test in Comment 5. > upgrade was good there ... except the process percentage is not incremental. That's a separate issue. And we are already tracking that. :) > Let me know if you think I should run the update again. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758 |