Bug 168870
Summary: | Whenever there is a crash, documents that were open are not recovered | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David <daveiro> |
Component: | openoffice.org | Assignee: | Jonathan Blandford <jrb> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | caillon, ddumas |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-09-20 19:30:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David
2005-09-20 19:24:18 UTC
Red Hat reviews and scrubs its code for intellectual property issues. Our approach has always been conservative, i.e., if there is any question, resolve the issue or remove the code. Red Hat recently implemented a number of changes in its distribution of OpenOffice to address such issues. These changes should not be construed as implying any immediate intellectual property problem; rather, they have been implemented to assure that no such immeidate problems arise. While implementing these changes in our own distribution of OpenOffice, we have also made them available upstream to the OpenOffice project. I'm sorry, I didn't understand your answer... do you mean the recovery wizzard has intellectual property issues? If it does, why OO.org in FC3 did have that wizzard? And if it has IP issues why don't you implement an alternative recovery process. Because it's still a beta version, it is very prone to crashes and severe data loss can occur... |