Bug 1688938
Summary: | Rebase libseccomp to version 2.4 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Daniel Kopeček <dkopecek> |
Component: | libseccomp | Assignee: | Marek Tamaskovic <mtamasko> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | yduan |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 8.1 | CC: | chayang, coli, dapospis, jinzhao, juzhang, mtamasko, rsroka, tjaros, yduan |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Rebase, Triaged |
Target Release: | 8.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-05 22:30:27 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1682490 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1602006 |
Comment 3
juzhang
2019-06-11 12:29:56 UTC
(In reply to Marek Tamaskovic from comment #4) > https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=22106084 Hi Marek, Sorry for the late response. The build you provided above is closed now, is that ok for QE to test with brew build https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/buildinfo?buildID=909913 ? Furthermore, QE will verify this bz according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425007#c15. If there is any mistake, please let me know. BR, yduan # wget http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/brewroot/vol/rhel-8/packages/libseccomp/2.4.1/1.el8/src/libseccomp-2.4.1-1.el8.src.rpm # rpm2cpio libseccomp-2.3.1-3.el7.src.rpm | cpio -div # tar -zxvf libseccomp-2.4.1-1.el8.src.rpm # cd libseccomp-2.4.1/ # ./configure; make check-build # cd tests # ./regression -T live =============== Thu Jun 20 14:02:12 CST 2019 =============== Regression Test Report ("regression -T live") batch name: 01-sim-allow test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 02-sim-basic test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 03-sim-basic_chains test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 04-sim-multilevel_chains test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 05-sim-long_jumps test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 06-sim-actions test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 07-sim-db_bug_looping test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 08-sim-subtree_checks test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 09-sim-syscall_priority_pre test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 10-sim-syscall_priority_post test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 11-basic-basic_errors test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 12-sim-basic_masked_ops test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 13-basic-attrs test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 14-sim-reset test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 15-basic-resolver test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 16-sim-arch_basic test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 17-sim-arch_merge test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 18-sim-basic_whitelist test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 19-sim-missing_syscalls test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 20-live-basic_die test mode: c test type: live Test 20-live-basic_die%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS Test 20-live-basic_die%%002-00001 result: SUCCESS Test 20-live-basic_die%%003-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 21-live-basic_allow test mode: c test type: live Test 21-live-basic_allow%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 22-sim-basic_chains_array test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 23-sim-arch_all_le_basic test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 24-live-arg_allow test mode: c test type: live Test 24-live-arg_allow%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 25-sim-multilevel_chains_adv test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 26-sim-arch_all_be_basic test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 27-sim-bpf_blk_state test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 28-sim-arch_x86 test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 29-sim-pseudo_syscall test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 30-sim-socket_syscalls test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 31-basic-version_check test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 32-live-tsync_allow test mode: c test type: live Test 32-live-tsync_allow%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 33-sim-socket_syscalls_be test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 34-sim-basic_blacklist test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 35-sim-negative_one test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 36-sim-ipc_syscalls test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 37-sim-ipc_syscalls_be test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 38-basic-pfc_coverage test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 39-basic-api_level test mode: c test type: basic batch name: 40-sim-log test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 41-sim-syscall_priority_arch test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 42-sim-adv_chains test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 43-sim-a2_order test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 44-live-a2_order test mode: c test type: live Test 44-live-a2_order%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 45-sim-chain_code_coverage test mode: c test type: bpf-sim batch name: 46-sim-kill_process test mode: c test type: bpf-sim batch name: 47-live-kill_process test mode: c test type: live Test 47-live-kill_process%%001-00001 result: SUCCESS batch name: 48-sim-32b_args test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-sim-fuzz test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 49-sim-64b_comparisons test mode: c test type: bpf-sim test mode: c test type: bpf-valgrind batch name: 50-sim-hash_collision test mode: c test type: bpf-sim Regression Test Summary tests run: 8 tests skipped: 0 tests passed: 8 tests failed: 0 tests errored: 0 ============================================================ Syscall-filter automation tests with libseccomp-2.4.1-1.el8.x86_64 passed. > Comment 6
yes you can.
MT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3624 |