Bug 1689149
| Summary: | Aggregated Logging installation does not add secret to serviceaccount | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Simon Reber <sreber> | |
| Component: | Logging | Assignee: | ewolinet | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Anping Li <anli> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 3.9.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, ewolinet, rmeggins | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | 3.9.z | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: |
Cause: When using secret whitelisting the openshift-logging roles don't add the secret names to the created service accounts.
Consequence: the service accounts don't have permissions to access the secrets.
Fix: Secrets to be used by service accounts are added during SA creation.
Result: The SA is able to use the secret even when whitelisting is used.
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1690603 1690605 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-04-09 14:20:18 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1690603, 1690605 | |||
|
Description
Simon Reber
2019-03-15 09:53:20 UTC
3.10 pr - https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/11366 3.9 pr - https://github.com/openshift/openshift-ansible/pull/11367 The secret are append to whitelisting in openshift-ansible:v3.9.74 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0619 |