Bug 1690211
Summary: | [RFE] Can fix enabling API federation failure with kubefed2 cmd | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Qin Ping <piqin> |
Component: | Federation | Assignee: | Maru Newby <mnewby> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Qin Ping <piqin> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.1.0 | CC: | mnewby, pmorie |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.1.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-06-04 10:46:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Qin Ping
2019-03-19 02:52:25 UTC
The problem of attempting to run `kubefed2 enable` against a non-existent namespace, this will be resolved by https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/federation-v2/pull/659, which will ensure that the federation system namespace exists before attempting to perform any action. Regarding the problem of `kubefed2 enable` complaining that a crd already exists, this was resolved by https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/federation-v2/pull/628 and the fix will appear in kubefed2 0.0.7. Regarding the problem of `kubefed2 disable` not being able to delete a crd without a federated type config being present, I think that is working as expected. kubefed2 is not intended to replace `kubectl delete`, so where a single resource needs to be deleted it will be up to the user to perform that operation manually. Should be fixed in 0.0.7 Verified with: kubefed2 version: version.Info{Version:"v0.0.7", GitCommit:"83b778b6d92a7929efb7687d3d3d64bf0b3ad3bc", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2019-03-19T18:40:46Z", GoVersion:"go1.11.2", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"} Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758 |