Bug 1694098

Summary: Update clamav to current version
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Fred Kienker <fkienker>
Component: clamavAssignee: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: el6CC: admin, anon.amish, bennie.joubert, gbcox, janfrode, j, ondrejj, orion, redhat-bugzilla, rh-bugzilla, sergio, steve
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-09 09:31:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Fred Kienker 2019-03-29 14:10:25 UTC
Description of problem: Current EPEL version is out of date

Version-Release number of current component (if applicable): 0.101.1-1

Would it be possible to update the EPEL el6 clamav from version 0.101.1-1 to 0.101.2-1? This would bring it in line with the developers' current version. The 0.101.2-1 version is already released on EPEL for epel7.


Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2019-04-05 03:09:48 UTC
clamav-0.100.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9c8cf7e4be

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2019-04-09 01:03:47 UTC
clamav-0.100.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 3 Sergio Basto 2019-04-09 01:28:27 UTC
Sorry el6 was not updated to 0.101 .

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2019-04-09 09:31:19 UTC
ClamAV was updated to the latest 0.100.x release, because updating to 0.101.x would lead to an ABI break. If really a ABI-breaking update is desired for EPEL 6 being close to EOL, this needs a separate bug report, but it also needs to be actually carried out by somebody else.

Comment 5 bunkobugsy 2019-10-25 12:58:55 UTC
*** Bug 1765556 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***