Bug 169416
Summary: | /etc/init.d/named insists on /etc/named.conf, although this can be changed | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Bojan Smojver <bojan> | ||||
Component: | bind | Assignee: | Jason Vas Dias <jvdias> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ben Levenson <benl> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 4.0 | CC: | poelstra | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | RHEL4U3NAK | ||||||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2006-0288 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-10 21:13:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | 170357 | ||||||
Bug Blocks: | 181409 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Bojan Smojver
2005-09-28 01:11:08 UTC
Created attachment 119370 [details]
/etc/init.d/named
Here's the named initscript to fix this issue :
# cp named.init /etc/init.d/named
# chown root:root /etc/init.d/named
# chmod 750 /etc/init.d/named
The /etc/init.d/named script that fixes this issue is attached above . It will be included in the next bind release for RHEL-4 (bind-9.2.4-11+) in RHEL-4-U3. You can get the latest BIND release for RHEL-4 from: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/BIND/RHEL-4 Thanks. That was quick :-) I can only see the i386 RPMS there. Can we have the SRPMS uploaded so we can build x84_64 version ourselves? In reply to Comment #3: Sorry, some files were mistakenly removed from the web server due to quota issues. There are now these versions of BIND for RHEL-4 available: http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/BIND/RHEL-4/9.2.4-10_EL4 likely to be the next version in RHEL-4-U3, this has all serious ISC BIND 9.2.5 bug fixes backported http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/BIND/RHEL-4/9.3.1-4_EL4 This is ISC BIND 9.3.1, with many new features over 9.2.4 , which we cannot submit to RHEL-4. NOTE: this particular bug is not fixed in either of the above releases - you'd still need to use the /etc/init.d/named script attached to this bug report to fix this issue. The fixed initscript will be submitted to bind-9.2.4-11+_EL4 / bind-9.3.1-5+_EL4 and made available on the same http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/BIND/RHEL-4/ website shortly, and should be in RHEL-4-U3. Thank you very much for your help! I will get those SRPMS and the init script and roll our own from it. BTW, I'm sure you mean RHEL-4-U2, not RHEL-4-U3... The binary RPMs for all platforms are built on our buildservers and available at the above location - you do not need to 'roll your own'. Use the init script attached to this bug report for any BIND version. Yes, I did mean RHEL-4-U3 - RHEL-4-U2 does not have any BIND update. But if I want to have a clean RPM that doesn't need any external file copying and includes that init script, I will need to roll my own. That's what I was referring to. Get the U2 v. U3 thing. I guess U2 has already been cut, so these come too late. That's cool. Looks good here. This was fixed with bind-9.2.4-12_EL4+ (current release bind-9.2.4-16.EL4), submitted in CVS, associated with errata RHBA-2006:020 and a candidate for the next RHEL-4 update release. This issue is on Red Hat Engineering's list of planned work items for the upcoming Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.4 release. Engineering resources have been assigned and barring unforeseen circumstances, Red Hat intends to include this item in the 4.4 release. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0288.html |