Bug 169506
Summary: | sbcl missing sb-posix | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ben <solnul> |
Component: | sbcl | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa, gemi |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-12-01 14:11:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 170026 |
Description
Ben
2005-09-29 04:17:44 UTC
Certainly odd. We've done nothing to omit sb-posix. Any clues how/why it didn't get included? Here's a link to the current build logs: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/4/1437-sbcl-0.9.5-8.fc4/ From the build.log, it *appears* sb-posix was at least built/compiled. It's not clear how/why it wasn't included in the final package. Gemi, any insight how/why sbcl's contrib/sb-posix didn't get included? It seems to get included in my local builds. In install.sh, it appears to only include/install contrib modules that have a 'tests-passed' file... perhaps sb-posix isn't creating that on the buildsystem? You could make a diff of your local build log and the build server's. I will make a mockbuild on my machine, and see what happens. Confirmed sb-posix is (still) missing from latest sbcl-0.9.5-15.fc4 build. I've tracked the cause down to a failure in gmake -C contrib/sb-posix test ... Test SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT.2 failed Form: (LET* ((SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT (SB-POSIX:STAT "/")) (SB-POSIX-TESTS::MODE (SB-POSIX:STAT-MODE SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT))) (LOGAND SB-POSIX-TESTS::MODE SB-POSIX:S-IWOTH)) Expected value: 0 Actual value: 2. ... Test SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT.4 failed Form: (LET* ((SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT (SB-POSIX:STAT (MAKE-PATHNAME :DIRECTORY '(:ABSOLUTE :UP)))) (SB-POSIX-TESTS::MODE (SB-POSIX:STAT-MODE SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT))) (LOGAND SB-POSIX-TESTS::MODE SB-POSIX:S-IWOTH)) Expected value: 0 Actual value: 2. ... 2 out of 42 total tests failed: SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT.2, SB-POSIX-TESTS::STAT.4.unhandled SIMPLE-ERROR in thread #<SB-THREAD:TH READ "initial thread" {9003571}>: non-errno tests failed! Good news is that in sbcl-0.9.6, these tests seem to pass and sb-posix gets included. Ack, the tests pass on the development/fc5 build, but fail in fc3/fc4. I'll keep looking. %changelog * Thu Oct 27 2005 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 0.9.6-5 - override (bogus/mock-induced) sb-posix test failure(s). |