Bug 1695205

Summary: cloud credential operator does not reset progressing transition timestamp when it upgrades
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Clayton Coleman <ccoleman>
Component: Cloud Credential OperatorAssignee: Devan Goodwin <dgoodwin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Oleg Nesterov <olnester>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.1.0CC: sponnaga
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.1.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-04 10:46:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Clayton Coleman 2019-04-02 16:20:18 UTC
During an upgrade, operators are required to update the lastTransitionTimestamp of Progressing when they start upgrading and when they complete.  If there is no need to set progressing, the last transition time should still be reset at the end of an upgrade when they hit "level".

When I started an upgrade (39m ago was the beginning) I see:

clusteroperator.config.openshift.io/dns                                  0.0.1                          True        False         False     56m

which means the operator did not reset progressing lastTransitionTime

This value is used to tell the admin when "something happened" and an upgrade is "something".

Comment 1 Clayton Coleman 2019-04-02 17:35:31 UTC
Cloud credential operator, not dns. Cut and paste error.

Comment 2 Clayton Coleman 2019-04-02 17:36:33 UTC
https://github.com/openshift/cluster-version-operator/pull/154 will document this and an e2e test will verify it in the future post-upgrade

Comment 4 Oleg Nesterov 2019-04-23 12:15:41 UTC
In tests I did upgrade from 4.0.0-0.nightly-2019-04-22-005059 to 4.0.0-0.nightly-2019-04-22-192613

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-06-04 10:46:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758