Bug 169544

Summary:	Review Request: php-tidy
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Simon Mundy <developer>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-extras-list
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://www.peptolab.com/developer/php-tidy-5.0.4-10.4.src.rpm
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-14 13:35:30 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Simon Mundy 2005-09-29 14:53:27 UTC

Spec Name or Url: http://www.peptolab.com/developer/php-tidy.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://www.peptolab.com/developer/php-tidy-5.0.4-10.4.src.rpm
Description: Adds the Tidy shared library to PHP

I wrote this in response to a suggestion by Joe Orton that Tidy support be moved to extras, as the LibTidy package also resides here.

Comment 1 Simon Mundy 2005-09-29 14:59:49 UTC

Sorry, I forgot to add that I've tied the initial release numbers to the most recent version of PHP - is this 
appropriate? I created the spec file using conventions from existing PHP packages to ensure it will meet 
your requirements.

Comment 2 Dmitry Butskoy 2005-10-10 16:00:54 UTC

Simon,

After some discussion in the fedora-extras-devel list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-October/msg00089.html ,
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-October/msg00212.html ,
a decision was accepted to create common source rpm package (php-extras) for all
subpackages with additional php modules not included in the main FC distro.

As php-tidy is a part of standard PHP5 distribution, the "php-extras" work seems
to eat your package completely... :)

See review request at bug #170131 . Let's work further together?..

Comment 3 Dmitry Butskoy 2005-10-14 13:35:30 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 170131 ***