Bug 169618
Summary: | tool creates duplicate listen 443 field | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | bob mckay <urilabob> |
Component: | system-config-httpd | Assignee: | Phil Knirsch <pknirsch> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | h2obrain, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-06-28 10:20:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
bob mckay
2005-09-30 10:47:54 UTC
Last week i've released system-config-httpd-1.4.1 for FC5, FC6 as testing and put it in FC-devel as well. Please give it a shot and let me know if this is working for you now. Thanks, Read ya, Phil Nope, it's still broken exactly the same in F8 (sorry, I had completely forgotten this bug request, only rediscovered it when I tried to build a new server in F8; since I assume I was emailed your request for feedback, I can only assume it got spam-canned). I think the problem is that system-config-httpd writes a new config file, but it is included in, doesn't over-write, the old ones. Since these already have Listen commands (for both ports 80 and 443) users get caught. Just google "Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address" There's a ton of comments out there on this, pointing out that the Listen 80 line in httpd.conf Listen 443 line in ssl.conf need to be commented out if you use the configuration tool. I imagine it isn't trivial to fix, since I assume the intention is for the tool to only update its file, not touching the default files. Yea, that was the way s-c-h behaved previously (overwrote the httpd.conf file completely), but that was just a horrible sysadmin experience. One thing i could do is to exclude 80 and 443 from the Listen command i add as those will be enabled by default. I'm planing a rather big upgrade for s-c-n over the next months anyway, so i'll make sure to include that as well. Read ya, Phil Right, the problem is, there isn't an 'unlisten' command. Excluding 80 and 443 from the Listen command will avoid this specific problem, so httpd will appear to work. But it will mean it's listening on all ip addresses on the server, whereas the user will presumably assume that it's listening only on the specific virtual servers enabled. I can imagine obscure gotcha's popping out of this down the track. Would it be appropriate to warn users of this in the gui? This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Moving to rawhide, but a rework of s-c-h is planed and i know this is still anm issue. Thanks & regards, Phil This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |