Bug 169724
| Summary: | unable to delete bridge interface | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz> |
| Component: | bridge-utils | Assignee: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | athlon | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-10-02 03:52:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 Fedora/1.0.7-1.1.fc4 Firefox/1.0.7 Description of problem: I am unable to create a bridge interface slaved to eth1 after creating it. brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xen-br0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 xen-br1 8000.00e081053c6c no eth1 sh-3.00# ifdown eth1 eth1: Setting promiscuous mode. eth1: Setting promiscuous mode. eth1: Setting promiscuous mode. eth1: Setting promiscuous mode. xen-br1: port 1(eth1) entering disabled state sh-3.00# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xen-br0 8000.feffffffffff no peth0 vif0.0 xen-br1 8000.00e081053c6c no eth1 sh-3.00# brctl delbr xen-br1 bridge xen-br1 is still up; can't delete it Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): bridge-utils-1.0.4-6 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Xen dom0, create second bridge slaved to eth1 2. Try to delete second bridge 3. Actual Results: bridge xen-br1 is still up; can't delete it Expected Results: bridge interface should be deleted Additional info: I am using hg checkout of xen, and xen kernel if you can't reproduce with the rpms you guys have just close it, when I tried with the rpms I got a panic when trying to bring the second bridge up. But as the changelog for xend says.....