Bug 1699536
| Summary: | Could we get a flatpak of this? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | rugk <7d28c752> |
| Component: | keepassxc | Assignee: | Germano Massullo (Thetra) <germano.massullo> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | germano.massullo, nonamedotc |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-01-23 23:46:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
rugk
2019-04-13 15:34:40 UTC
I have no experience on flatpaks ... and, I am not going to be able to get get to this right away. ;( Here some more information/links that could help: It would be great if you could provide a flatpak package to https://registry.fedoraproject.org/. Especially for users of Fedora Silverblue https://silverblue.fedoraproject.org/ this then allows a seamless installation and upgrades without rebooting the system (just restarting the application). Additionally, flatpaks can of course be installed on any distro, so also non-Fedora users could use it. More details: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation/Flatpaks * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Graphical_Applications_as_Flatpaks Also the flatpak version on Flathub of this looks really, really ugly. (strange icons, small text etc.) Seems like some GTK theme (or QT actually?) is not properly applied. Maybe this can be improved when you build your own flatpak. I guess it depends on what runtime you choose as a base for the flatpak. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31. FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c11c070660 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c11c070660 FEDORA-2019-9188f20552 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9188f20552 This message is a reminder that Fedora 31 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 31 on 2020-11-24. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '31'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 31 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. It's a feature request, independent of the version. I don't have any plan to add flatpak support. Anybody willing to contribute is welcome |