Bug 1701793

 - Use something like 0.0.YYYYMMDD in case upstream decides to make proper releases at one point:

Version:        0.0.20190413


 - Some icons are based of other license:

Some icons are based on:
    - Paper icon theme (https://github.com/snwh/paper-icon-theme)
      Author: Sam Hewitt (https://samuelhewitt.com)
      License: CC-BY-SA-4.0

    - EvoPop icon theme (https://github.com/poltertec/evopop-icon-theme)
      Author Peter Cornelis (https://github.com/poltertec)
      License: CC-BY-SA-4.0

    - Numix icon theme (https://github.com/numixproject/numix-icon-theme)
      Author: Numix Project (https://github.com/numixproject)
      License: GPL-3.0

    - Flattr icon theme
      Author: Nitrux Project (https://nxos.org)
      License: CC-BY-SA-4.0

    - Papirus icon theme (https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/papirus-icon-theme)
      Author: Papirus Development Team (https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam)
      License: GPL-3.0

Please also include CC-BY-SA in License.


Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issues before import.


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: flat-remix-icon-theme-2019.04.13-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
          flat-remix-icon-theme-2019.04.13-1.fc31.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/flat-remix-icon-theme.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/flat-remix-icon-theme-0.0.20190413-1.fc30.src.rpm

All good, approved.

(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flat-remix-icon-theme

flat-remix-icon-theme-0.0.20190413-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-00f50743ac

flat-remix-icon-theme-0.0.20190413-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-00f50743ac

flat-remix-icon-theme-0.0.20190413-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.