Bug 1702076

Summary: group filters based on openstack providers not respected in pod list
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Satoe Imaishi <simaishi>
Component: ApplianceAssignee: Nick LaMuro <nlamuro>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Antonin Pagac <apagac>
Severity: low Docs Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority: low    
Version: 5.9.4CC: abellott, dmetzger, fdewaley, gtanzill, hkataria, jprause, lavenel, mpovolny, mshriver, nlamuro, obarenbo, smallamp
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: 5.10.4   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.10.4.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1631694 Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-21 05:46:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1631694    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2019-04-24 19:47:09 UTC 
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/hammer:

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/9abba2b4e6e4811bbd6242ad1e16543047a2c7a6
commit 9abba2b4e6e4811bbd6242ad1e16543047a2c7a6
Author:     Keenan Brock <keenan>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 15 08:33:33 2019 -0400
Commit:     Keenan Brock <keenan>
CommitDate: Mon Apr 15 08:33:33 2019 -0400

    Merge pull request #18654 from NickLaMuro/fix-container-group-entitlement-filtering-in-rbac

    Fix Container* belongsto filter in Rbac::Filterer

    (cherry picked from commit 171c2815e96c61858a224ec431b939f8c39be1b2)

    Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702076

 lib/rbac/filterer.rb | 46 +-
 spec/lib/rbac/filterer_spec.rb | 73 +
 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comment 3 Antonin Pagac 2019-04-26 09:16:12 UTC 
Verified with 5.10.4.0.

User can now see only providers based on filters set in Hosts & Clusters tab in user Group. Same with pods.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2019-05-21 05:46:56 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:1247
Comment 6 Sudhir Mallamprabhakara 2019-11-12 03:39:49 UTC 
Changing the test coverage to + as we have the test coverage covered in the original BZ 1631694