Bug 1703007

Summary: The telnet or something would cause high memory usage for glusterd & glusterfsd
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Terry Cui <i_chips>
Component: glusterdAssignee: bugs <bugs>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5CC: amukherj, bugs, pasik
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-09 05:34:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Terry Cui 2019-04-25 09:33:02 UTC
Description of problem:
  I'm afraid that the telnet or something would cause high memory usage for glusterd & glusterfsd.

  For example, if the script is executed for days:

  while [[ 1 ]]; do
      echo "quit" | telnet xx.xx.xx.xx 24007
      echo "quit" | telnet xx.xx.xx.xx 49152
  done
  
  Later, the memory usage for glusterd & glusterfsd would be changed from 0.5% to 2.9%.
  
  Hope someone could help me. Thanks a lot.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GlusterFS 5.6 or below

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Atin Mukherjee 2019-04-29 03:08:35 UTC
It's not clear to me how would a telnet cause an increase in the memory consumption of glusterd process and more over what's the motivation behind this? Could you help us in providing the following by a small test:

Before and after telnet, capture statedumps of glusterd process (kill -SIGUSR1 $(pidof glusterd) and find the files in /var/run/gluster and share back here? Also do you see any logs in the glusterd and brick log files when you attempt to do telnet.

Comment 2 Atin Mukherjee 2019-05-08 04:32:42 UTC
Ping?

Comment 3 Atin Mukherjee 2019-06-09 05:34:35 UTC
Closing this as we haven't received sufficient information.

Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 05:27:34 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days