Bug 1703091
| Summary: | Since we're using nova_cell0 instead of nova database, nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows is no longer archiving deleted rows | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | David Hill <dhill> | |
| Component: | openstack-nova | Assignee: | melanie witt <mwitt> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Paras Babbar <pbabbar> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | medium | |||
| Version: | 13.0 (Queens) | CC: | amodi, chrisbro, cmedeiro, dasmith, jhakimra, jhardee, kchamart, lyarwood, mwitt, nlevinki, nwolf, sbauza, sgordon, vromanso | |
| Target Milestone: | Upstream M3 | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Patch, Triaged | |
| Target Release: | 16.0 (Train on RHEL 8.1) | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | openstack-nova-20.0.1-0.20191025043858.390db63.el8ost | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1748990 1749087 1752711 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-02-06 14:40:18 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1748990, 1749087, 1752711, 1769458, 1778905 | |||
|
Description
David Hill
2019-04-25 13:39:53 UTC
MariaDB [nova_cell0]> select count(*) from instances where deleted_at is not null; +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 708405 | +----------+ We do have a workaround on this and it's to use --config-file nova_cell0.conf where we changed the connection string to use nova_cell0 instead of nova. This is still a bug in my opinion if customers have a big failure rate, that will consume a lot of disk space that could be avoided with the cleanup cronjobs. Hi Team, Can I get an update with this as this impacting a very important customer? Hey Chris,
I created another BZ for another issue but this helps cleaning up common tables but some of them are not cleaned up which I feel like it's another issue.
We do have a workaround which is to set the connection string to nova_cell0 instead of nova and call that configuration using nova-manage.
Thank you very much,
David Hill
Upstream patch has merged: https://review.opendev.org/507486 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:0283 |