Bug 1703154

Summary: packaging bug in redfish-finder
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Andrei Stepanov <astepano>
Component: redfish-finderAssignee: Joel Savitz <jsavitz>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Rachel Sibley <rasibley>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.2CC: bhu, core-kernel-mgr, jwboyer, tbowling
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 8.3Flags: nhorman: needinfo? (astepano)
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-01 07:40:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1825061    

Comment 1 Neil Horman 2019-04-26 11:29:30 UTC
yes, it does require python3, not sure what the bug is here

Comment 3 Neil Horman 2019-04-26 12:34:22 UTC
hmm, where are you getting your rpm from?

rpm2cpio /home/nhorman/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/redfish-finder-0.2-1.fc29.noarch.rpm | cpio -d -i
75 blocks
[nhorman@hmswarspite test]$ head ./usr/bin/redfish-finder 
#!/usr/bin/python3

import sys
import os
import subprocess
import ipaddress
import argparse

Comment 5 Neil Horman 2019-04-26 14:39:33 UTC
Ok, I see, though thats less than self evident from a developer perspective.  The rpm packaging macros apparently rewrite the script command line during the build, but makes it unclear what package to depend on.  Given Ians response to your question on email, I think we're ok here though.

Comment 6 Andrei Stepanov 2019-04-26 15:00:38 UTC
I am sorry, but, your package doesn't need to depend on 'python3'
You use: #!/usr/libexec/platform-python
rpm -qf /usr/libexec/platform-python
platform-python-3.6.8-1.el8.x86_64
You package uses platform-python
Answer from Ian McLeod is irrelevant to this bug.

Comment 7 Neil Horman 2019-04-26 17:07:41 UTC
Is there something actually broken here?  do you have an actual error to report?  You've got this opened against 8.0, and its way to late to get anything fixed in 8.0 unless its a critical bug, so unless there is something customer visible that is truly broken here, I'm really not especially worried about it.

Comment 8 Andrei Stepanov 2019-04-29 10:24:57 UTC
Neil Hi.

> Is there something actually broken here?
>Do you have an actual error to report?

Functionality is OK.
This bug-report was opened for bug in RPM packaging.

> You've got this opened against 8.0

I changed "Target Release" to 8.2

Comment 12 Neil Horman 2019-12-11 21:01:37 UTC
no, it can wait

Comment 20 RHEL Program Management 2021-02-01 07:40:15 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.