Bug 1703680

Summary: backintime-1.2.0 is available
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring>
Component: backintimeAssignee: hannes <johannes.lips>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: johannes.lips, projects.rg, rosset.filipe
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-04-29 18:30:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
spec file none

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-04-27 15:03:06 UTC 
Latest upstream release: 1.2.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.24-7.fc30
URL: https://github.com/bit-team/backintime

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.

Based on the information from anitya:  https://release-monitoring.org/project/156/
Comment 1 hannes 2019-04-28 14:01:43 UTC 
Created attachment 1559619 [details]
spec file

spec file for 1.2.0
Comment 2 hannes 2019-04-28 14:03:01 UTC 
I've updated the spec file, but would be happy if someone else could check it and additionally comment on the fact if we actually need the common subpackage, since there's only one Qt GUI left, which needs to be installed anyway. So I don't think the package split does add something.
Comment 3 hannes 2019-04-29 18:30:50 UTC 
Ok, I've pushed a new build to rawhide and f30. Will see how it looks and then decide if we make the update to f29 as well.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1260120