Bug 170383

Summary:	mod_ssl per-directory renegotiation with request body
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Joe Orton <jorton>
Component:	httpd	Assignee:	Joe Orton <jorton>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0	CC:	jhouska
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i686
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	RHEL4U3NAK
Fixed In Version:	RHSA-2006-0159	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-01-05 15:55:06 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Joe Orton 2005-10-11 08:37:14 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #123585 +++

This is a clone of bug 123585 for RHEL4 -- mod_ssl cannot perform per-directory
renegotiation for a request including a request body.

Comment 2 Leif Nixon 2005-10-11 11:43:03 UTC

Any chance of getting the experimental packages in bug 123585 in an RHEL4
version as well? I'd like to try it out, but the sslreneg patch fails to apply
cleanly on the RHEL4 httpd sources.

Comment 3 Joe Orton 2005-10-11 14:48:54 UTC

Coming shortly, Leif.

Comment 5 Joe Orton 2005-10-12 13:27:34 UTC

Experimental test packages are now available which contain a patch to
correct this issue.  These packages are unsupported and have not gone
through the Red Hat QA process.

http://people.redhat.com/jorton/Nahant-httpd/

Any feedback from testing these packages is very welcome.

Comment 8 Leif Nixon 2005-12-05 17:15:58 UTC

These packages do indeed seem to solve our problems. Thanks, and sorry for the
late reply.

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-01-05 15:55:06 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0159.html