Bug 1703878
Summary: | [upgrade] Pod behind service load balancer becomes unavailable during cluster upgrade | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Clayton Coleman <ccoleman> |
Component: | Cloud Compute | Assignee: | Jan Chaloupka <jchaloup> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jianwei Hou <jhou> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.1.0 | CC: | agarcial, gblomqui |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Upgrades |
Target Release: | 4.1.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-06-04 10:48:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Clayton Coleman
2019-04-29 01:29:09 UTC
https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/22711 will enable PDBs PR https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/22711 got merged on May 1, 2019, 5:42 AM GMT+2. I went through PRs that are already merged and all the `ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade` tests went green after the timestamp. At the same time all the failed `ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade` runs were red and failed for the reason as described in this report. I have also checked new PRs and did not see any `ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade` test failing for the reasons mentioned in this report. Seeing this https://openshift-gce-devel.appspot.com/build/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-upgrade/1146 in recent runs which looks like a different failure: May 3 15:34:41.108: Timed out waiting for service "service-test" to have a load balancer github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*ServiceTestJig).waitForConditionOrFail(0xc002ba92c0, 0xc0029edfc0, 0x1f, 0xc0023f01a0, 0xc, 0x1176592e000, 0x4e4686e, 0x14, 0x50911d0, 0x0) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/service_util.go:589 +0x1e9 github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*ServiceTestJig).WaitForLoadBalancerOrFail(0xc002ba92c0, 0xc0029edfc0, 0x1f, 0xc0023f01a0, 0xc, 0x1176592e000, 0x25) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/service_util.go:548 +0x15d github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/upgrades.(*ServiceUpgradeTest).Setup(0xc001e585d0, 0xc0023a42c0) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/upgrades/services.go:52 +0x195 github.com/openshift/origin/test/e2e/upgrade.(*chaosMonkeyAdapter).Test(0xc002475840, 0xc002142960) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/e2e/upgrade/upgrade.go:165 +0x180 github.com/openshift/origin/test/e2e/upgrade.(*chaosMonkeyAdapter).Test-fm(0xc002142960) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/test/e2e/upgrade/upgrade.go:245 +0x34 github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/chaosmonkey.(*chaosmonkey).Do.func1(0xc002142960, 0xc0027b5d50) /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/chaosmonkey/chaosmonkey.go:89 +0x76 created by github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/chaosmonkey.(*chaosmonkey).Do /go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/chaosmonkey/chaosmonkey.go:86 +0xa7 Will spawn a separate bug for that. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758 |