Bug 1705583

Summary: org.gnome.baobab.gschema.xml not valid against DTD
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Martin Krajnak <mkrajnak>
Component: baobabAssignee: Ondrej Holy <oholy>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.0CC: jkoten
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: baobab-3.28.0-2.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-05 22:14:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
custom validation script none

Description Martin Krajnak 2019-05-02 14:02:06 UTC 
Created attachment 1561673 [details]
custom validation script

Description of problem:
Based on the discussion with cgarnch. the file org.gnome.baobab.gschema.xml, 
located in /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas should be valid against this DTD schema:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/blob/master/gio/gschema.dtd

which is not a case.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
baobab-3.28.0-1.el8.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Actual results:
Around 500 errors: 
.
.
.
/org.gnome.baobab.gschema.xml:581:0:ERROR:VALID:DTD_UNKNOWN_ATTRIBUTE: No declaration for attribute lang of element description

Expected results:
There should be no errors

Additional info:
I am attaching script in python3 I used for validation.
Comment 1 Ondrej Holy 2019-05-03 09:01:55 UTC 
The following commit should fix this:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/baobab/commit/80f7e1c144103d52a877f2d42db6a427867591f6
Comment 2 Martin Krajnak 2019-05-06 10:48:25 UTC 
(In reply to Ondrej Holy from comment #1)
> The following commit should fix this:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/baobab/commit/
> 80f7e1c144103d52a877f2d42db6a427867591f6

Yes, I can confirm that I tested the schema after path and it passes validation.
Comment 4 Martin Krajnak 2019-07-09 12:54:21 UTC 
no erorrs in 
baobab-3.28.0-2.el8.x86_6
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-11-05 22:14:04 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3553