Bug 170566

Summary:	Dependancy issue updating ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3	Reporter:	Ian Laurie <nixuser>
Component:	ruby	Assignee:	Daniel Riek <riek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Bill Huang <bhuang>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	bressers, chris.tolley, dgregor, poelstra
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-25 17:41:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ian Laurie 2005-10-12 22:03:51 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050921 Red Hat/1.7.12-1.1.3.2

Description of problem:
ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3 won't update because there isn't a corresponding ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-9.EL3.4 in the update set.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Launch up2date and try to update ruby.
2.
3.
  

Actual Results:  Failed dependancy.

Expected Results:  ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-9.EL3.4 should be in the channel.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2005-10-13 15:26:50 UTC

The whole packages has been pushed again. thank you for your report.

Comment 4 mike ledoux 2005-10-18 16:17:47 UTC

This is still a problem with the packages in RHN today. 
ruby-tclck-1.6.8-9.EL3.4, ruby-docs-1.6.8-9.EL3.4 and irb-1.6.8-9.EL3.4 are not
available in the Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (v. 3 for x86) channel.  I was able
to get the missing packages by pulling down and building ruby-1.6.8-9.EL3.4.src.rpm.

Comment 9 Need Real Name 2005-10-19 14:15:25 UTC

I'd opened this case up via normal support, and was linked this bug report this
morning.  I'm going to keep my support case open as well to make sure this bug
doesn't lose traction.

The missing packages are definitely produced from rebuilding the ruby SRPM.

Comment 10 Josh Bressers 2005-10-25 17:41:27 UTC

I have repushed the ruby errata which now contains the missing packages.