Bug 1706169

Summary: Expletive words found in package names
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: jeffj1101
Component: fedora-reposAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 29CC: dennis, kellin, kevin, mboddu, package-review, pbrobinson, thrcka
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-05-03 18:17:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screen grab none

Description jeffj1101 2019-05-03 17:30:06 UTC
Created attachment 1562619 [details]
Screen grab

Description of problem:

Searching for steam on dnf, amongst the results, I saw this:


python2-fuckit.noarch : The Python Error Steamroller
python3-fuckit.noarch : The Python Error Steamroller

I think the use of expletives should be removed from packaging as this is seen as unprofessional and could result in uncomfortable situations in the workplace. 
These packages are part of the 'fedora' repo. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 29 


How reproducible:
Everytime 

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open terminal
2.Do 'dnf search steam'
3.Observe the results

Actual results:

Result include packages with profanity in it. I.e. 

the words 'fuck'. 

Expected results:

A less profane package names. e.g. 

python2-fixit.noarch : The Python Error Steamroller
python3-fixit.noarch : The Python Error Steamroller

Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Robinson 2019-05-03 18:17:46 UTC
I don't believe it's in violation of the packaging guidelines and should probably be taken to the Fedora Packaging Committee or FESCo (Fedora Engineering Steering Committe, it can't be resolved in this bug as the fedora-repos package is purely for fedora repository configuration data so it's not actually a bug in a package per se but a policy decision which can't be solved here.