Bug 1707059
| Summary: | no termination message provided by failing cluster-storage-operator pod | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Luis Sanchez <sanchezl> |
| Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Bradley Childs <bchilds> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Liang Xia <lxia> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.1.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, aos-storage-staff, bbennett, chaoyang, fbertina, lxia, mifiedle, sejug |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 1707050 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2019-10-16 06:28:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Luis Sanchez
2019-05-06 17:31:26 UTC
Pushing this to 4.2. We could consider a fix in 4.1.z, but it doesn't seem worth blocking 4.1.0 for this. PR opened: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-storage-operator/pull/33. agree it's not a blocker. No risk if we merge it early though. $ oc get co storage
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING DEGRADED SINCE
storage 4.2.0-0.nightly-2019-06-24-160709 True False False 56m
$ oc get pods -n openshift-cluster-storage-operator -o yaml | grep -i termination
terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
terminationMessagePolicy: FallbackToLogsOnError
terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2922 |