Bug 1708928
Summary: | Review Request: libstrangle - Frame rate limiter for Linux | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Artem <ego.cordatus> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, zebob.m |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-10 00:58:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
Artem
2019-05-11 18:01:58 UTC
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libstrangle.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/libstrangle-0.0.4-9.fc30.src.rpm - Libs should not be installed in hardcoded %{_prefix}/lib/ but %{_libdir} Maybe patch LIB64_PATH/LIB32_PATH in Makefile to point to the correct directories. (check if it works correctly) - I can't build it: DEBUG util.py:587: Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:23 ago on Wed Jun 5 23:28:14 2019. DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: No matching package to install: 'glibc-devel(x86-32)' DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Not all dependencies satisfied DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: Some packages could not be found. Does not work on Koji either. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35319077 I have no idea how you build it on COPR with no issue. Also you would need to patch the makefile to use Fedora defauls cflags and ldflags. Try asking on devel what's wrong with that. Also I don't think it's ok to put both 32 bits and 64 bits libraries in the 64 bits package. You should build 32 bits lib in the i686 arch and 64 bits lib in the x86_64 arch. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |