Bug 1709456
| Summary: | [3.11] oc get node -w with -o custom-columns, -o yaml, -o name does not "watch" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Pablo Alonso Rodriguez <palonsor> |
| Component: | oc | Assignee: | Maciej Szulik <maszulik> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Xingxing Xia <xxia> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 3.11.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, knakayam, maszulik, mmccomas, sople, sponnaga |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | 3.11.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-10-07 20:53:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 6
Maciej Szulik
2019-06-24 11:56:43 UTC
I'm worried that the backport might not be as easy as it seams. If the customer is happy can we then close this bug? Sivkumar have you reached out to customer with my previous comment and did you hear back from them? I'm adding UpcomingSprint since I'm waiting customer input. I haven't heard from anyone and both of the customer cases are closed. I'm going to close this as well. Feel free to re-open if still needed. I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I'm also waiting for OA decision since this backport is not a simple one. I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I'm also waiting for OA decision since this backport is not a simple one. Thank you for continuing to use Red Hat OpenShift. As part of a wider bug review, this bug has been evaluated and we have determined that at this time we do not plan to progress it. As such, we will be closing this bug. If you have need for continued assistance on this issue, please reopen the bug with additional context on why it needs to be reconsidered. |