Bug 1709957

Summary: wrong number of cells for None row in Catalog Item->Request Info->Catalog->Selected VM
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Ievgen Zapolskyi <izapolsk>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Tasos Papaioannou <tpapaioa>
Severity: low Docs Contact: Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority: low    
Version: 5.10.4CC: bmidwood, dmetzger, hkataria, lavenel, mpovolny, obarenbo, simaishi, tpapaioa
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: 5.11.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.11.0.4 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-12-12 13:36:27 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screen shot none

Description Ievgen Zapolskyi 2019-05-14 16:10:22 UTC
Created attachment 1568544 [details]
screen shot

Description of problem:
None row has one extra cell in Selected VM table. look at screenshot

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.10.4.3

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open Service->Catalogs->Catalog Items
2. Choose Configuration->Add a New Catalog Item
3. Choose Catalog Item type f.e. RedHat Virtualization
4. Open Request Info tab

Actual results:
None row has one extra cell

Expected results:
correctly rendered table

Additional info:

Comment 4 Tasos Papaioannou 2019-05-20 16:56:27 UTC
Verified on 5.11.0.4.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-12-12 13:36:27 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199