Bug 1710879
Summary: | Impossible to update existing subnet using --no-host-route option | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Alex Stupnikov <astupnik> |
Component: | python-openstackclient | Assignee: | Julie Pichon <jpichon> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | nlevinki <nlevinki> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 13.0 (Queens) | CC: | apevec, beth.white, jpichon, lhh, ndeevy |
Target Milestone: | z8 | Keywords: | Triaged, ZStream |
Target Release: | 13.0 (Queens) | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | python-openstackclient-3.14.3-4.el7ost | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Previously, host routes took an empty string by default. As a result, updating a subnet with the `openstack subnet set` command failed when setting the `--no-host-route` option.
With this update, the host routes accept an empty list by default, and updating a subnet with the `openstack subnet set` command succeeds even when you do not set the `--no-host-route` option.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-09-03 16:58:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alex Stupnikov
2019-05-16 13:39:48 UTC
Steps to reproduce: - Create test subnet with static routes. - Run the following command for new subnet: ""openstack subnet set test-rh-subnet --no-host-route"" Expected result: associated routes are removed Actual result: BadRequestException: Unknown error Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2623 |