Bug 171508
| Summary: | gtk-update-icon-cache | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
| Component: | konversation | Assignee: | Dennis Gilmore <dennis> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-10-23 05:08:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Rex Dieter
2005-10-21 21:58:10 UTC
Touching the icon theme top directory, well, acceptable. But running gtk-update-icon-cache is polluting a KDE app package spec with stuff that doesn't belong in there, IMO. > But running gtk-update-icon-cache is polluting a KDE app package spec > with stuff that doesn't belong in there, IMO. Agreed. It can be omitted, but the touch, at least, is required by the icon spec. One of these days, the gtk2/gtk-update-icon-cache maintainer will see the light and make gtk-update-icon-cache a periodic cron-job as it should be (see bug #170335) i agree with Michael on this. definetly for KDE packages there should be no need to add stuff that is gnome specific. something like that that will touch so many packages should be automated because packages will slip through the cracks. Which icon spec are you talking about? See: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#implementation_notes ok i am not going to add the gtk-update-icons part but i have added the touch on the dir. |